The Hidden Equations of Turbulence in Van Gogh’s The Starry Night

When you look at Van Gogh’s 1889 painting The Starry Night, you see swirling clouds, glowing stars, and a dreamy night sky. It looks like a peaceful landscape. But what you might actually be seeing is a visual snapshot of one of physics’ greatest unsolved mysteries: turbulence.

When you look at Van Gogh’s 1889 painting The Starry Night, you see swirling clouds, glowing stars, and a dreamy night sky. It looks like a peaceful landscape. But what you might actually be seeing is a visual snapshot of one of physics’ greatest unsolved mysteries: turbulence.

Turbulence is the chaotic, unpredictable, multi-layered motion of fluids and gases. Think wind blowing, waves crashing, clouds twisting. For physicists, it’s a nightmare. The famous physicist Heisenberg once said, “When I meet God, I’m going to ask Him two things: Why relativity, and why turbulence? I think He’ll have an answer for the first.” That’s how complicated it is.

But here’s the wild part: Van Gogh, without any scientific background, may have painted this complex phenomenon almost mathematically accurately — using nothing but his brushes. Seriously.

In 2004, scientists were analyzing Hubble space images when they noticed something odd: the swirling gas and dust around a distant star looked exactly like The Starry Night. And that’s where things got weird.

Researchers from Mexico, Spain, and the UK digitized Van Gogh’s paintings and measured how brightness changed between pixels. What they found was that the luminance in The Starry Night matched Kolmogorov’s mathematical theory of turbulence almost exactly. So the painting wasn’t just a dreamlike guess — it had the same numerical structure as chaotic flow in nature.

Even weirder: this pattern only showed up in paintings Van Gogh made during his most psychologically unstable periods. The same analysis on calmer works — like his self-portraits — or chaotic-looking paintings by other artists (like Munch’s The Scream) didn’t show the same turbulence signature. Just Van Gogh. Just then.

So here’s the idea: during a mental breakdown, one man may have instinctively seen and painted one of the universe’s most complex behaviors. He wasn’t a scientist. He wasn’t a physicist. But with oil and emotion, he captured the math of interstellar gas. And he probably had no idea.

This isn’t just a painting. It’s a brain picking up the secret codes of the cosmos — and turning them into color. And yes, that’s so cool it should be illegal.

Thanks for reading!

More Resources Like This

Scroll to Top